Securities

Kinsella’s media notice experience in securities cases ranges from national and international news publications to key business publications and banner ads on financial websites. All media notices are designed to support and supplement direct notice efforts to class members and brokers.

Selected Case Experience: Securities

In re NASDAQ Market-Makers Antitrust Litigation

No. 94-CV-3996, MDL No. 123 (S.D.N.Y.)

Kinsella Media’s work on the NASDAQ litigation notice program was notable for the sustained and innovative use of site-based Internet advertising to reach potential class members. The firm placed banner advertisements on financial websites (e.g., TheStreet.com, MotleyFool.com) that are heavily frequented by active investors. In addition, the firm advertised in a mix of financial and consumer publications to reach both heavy and light investors.

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bear Stearns and Co. Inc.,

No. 03 Civ. 2937 (S.D.N.Y.)

The Global Research Analyst Settlement resolved matters with the SEC regarding the sale of securities by certain brokers. In addition to direct notice to readily identifiable class members, the notice program included extensive published notice in Investor's Business Daily, Barron's, The New York Times, International Herald Tribune and the global edition of The Wall Street Journal. Extensive Internet advertising was also used on websites such as Fortune.com and CNNMoney.com.

In re HealthSouth Bondholder Litigation

No. 03-BE-1502-S (N.D. Ala.)

In re HealthSouth Corporation Securities Litigation

No. CV-03-BE-1500-S (N.D. Ala.)

In re HealthSouth Stockholder Litigation

No. CV-03-BE-1501-S (N.D. Ala.)

In re Motorola Securities Litigation

No. 03 C 00287 (N.D. Ill.)

In re Realogy Corp. Shareholder Litigation

No. C-181-06 (N.J. Super. Ct. Morris County)

In re Spear & Jackson Securities Litigation

No. 04-80375-CIV (S.D. Fla.)

In re Telecommunications, Inc. Shareholders Litigation

No. 16470 (Del. Ch. Ct. New Castle County)

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Federal National Mortgage Association

No. 1:06-cv-00959 (D.D.C.)

"Notice of the proposed Settlement of this Action was given to all Class Members who could be identified with reasonable effort. The form, content and method of notifying the Class of the settlement of the action as a class action and of the terms and conditions of the proposed Settlement met the requirements of rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Section 21D(a)(7) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(7), as amended by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, due process and any other applicable law, constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances, and constituted due and sufficient notice to all persons and entities entitled thereto."

— Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer
In re Motorola Securities Litigation
No. 03 C 00287 (N.D. Ill.)

Featured Media

Galanti v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

TV Spot

Play

How Can We Help You?

Contact us before the settlement is complete to discuss a media notice plan that reaches class members using plain language, meets CAFA requirements and meets quantifiable measures of adequacy.

202.686.4111